serial class ivedimas ir prototipu uzdraudimas

Vienintelis saziningas issukis kuri as girdziu is norinciu apriboti “competition” sparnu skraidyma skamba taip:
“Mes patis bijome su tokiais varyti bet ir kitiems cia nera kuo…”

Na o tiem kurie dar neapsisprende ar palaikyti ar paneigti si “nordiku” pasiulyma verta paskaityti subalansuota Adriano Thomaso nuomone:

But the safety record of the PWC is far far better than the safety
record of CIVL competitons, and PWC has been open, with pilots flying
uncertified protos for a long time. The difference is that the selection
procedures at PWC level mean that only the best pilots get in. The
accident rate in CIVL comps is higher because the level of pilot ability
is lower, but this lower ability level is not catered for by setting
safer tasks, or choosing safer places to fly in.

The BHPA accident statistics show high rates of accidents for club
pilots, moderate levels for pilot rated and very low levels of
accidents, in either real numbers or as a percentage of the active
pilots for advanced pilots.

If pilots make honest assessments of their abilities, and choose gliders
accordingly – as happens in the British Nationals for example – then
there is no need to force everyone to fly a particular class of glider.

If a racing class is defined in relation to a safety certification
standard, then (as Gin said at the CIVL meeting last year) the
manufacturers will absolutely push the limits of the safety standard –
instead of designing gliders to match a particular group of pilots they
will design the gliders that achieve the maximum possible performance
while still (just) passing at the required safety rating. The resulting
gliders will, like some well known wings around now, have _fake_ safety
ratings that do not really reflect their level of safety in real flight,
but just reflect their precise fit to a certain set of prescribed tests.

There is a way to define racing classes without adversely affecting the
safety testing systems, and that is to define the classes in terms of
the things that affect performance. For example limit flat aspect ratio
to a maximum of 6 and line length to a minimum of 420m…..

Cheers,
Adrian Thomas

Martynai,
Neturek iliuziju. Ir skaityk ne tik “nordiku” argumentus.
Pvz. nera lengvo budo patikrinti ar v. dalyviu sparnai atitinka nuroditoms specifikacijoms. Net DHV sertifikuojant sparnus nematuoja ju geometriniu parametru – taigi gali sertifikuoti viena sparna o pardavineti i ji panasu. Bandimai atlikti tokius matavimus buvo daryti ne viena karta, trunka 8-10 val. kruopstaus darbo vienam sparnui. …Ir baigsis viskas tuo kad visi skraidys “serial class” bet kai kuriu pilotu sparani bus “more serial than others”.
O seip, Adrianas ne apie tai rase, o tu pamacius viena pazystama zodi “PWC” iskart pradejai pusti i savo duda. Pabandyk perskaityti jo nuomone dar karta.
As tikiuosiu tu ji gerbi kaip zmogu?

test.
Kazkokia durnyste, prirasdai o paskelbti negali.
vio

Diskusijos pabaiga

CIVL plenariniame posedyje po ilgu svarstymu ir gincu bei isklausius saugumo ir mokymo komisijojos isvadas buvo nubalsuota, ir gana zymia balsu persvara Siaurieciu pasiulymas buvo atmestas
Prototipai ir toliau egzistuos
Serijines klases ir toliau nebus kaip atskiros